Sign in

    MYERS INDUSTRIES (MYE)

    MYE Q2 2024: $8M synergies from Signature; H2 margins to dip

    Reported on Aug 1, 2024 (Before Market Open)
    Pre-Earnings Price$14.90Last close (Jul 31, 2024)
    Post-Earnings Price$16.35Open (Aug 1, 2024)
    Price Change
    $1.45(+9.73%)

    What went well

    • Signature Systems integration is progressing well, with both qualitative and quantitative indicators confirming strong cultural fit and cost synergies (targeting $8 million in annual synergies in 2025) that support margin expansion and revenue growth.
    • Operational efficiencies are delivering capacity gains, as evidenced by increased throughput (20–30% more capacity from existing equipment) and strategic consolidations that enable cost reductions while preserving future scalability.
    • The defense/military segment shows attractive growth potential, with multiple contracts already in place and expectations to grow from $10 million to $40 million in revenue, indicating a robust long-term tailwind despite short-term lumpiness.

    What went wrong

    • Margin pressures in core segments: While the Signature acquisition has boosted margins, management expects a slight decline in gross margin in the second half of the year due to lower pricing and volume pressures in its core Material Handling and Distribution businesses.
    • Vulnerable distribution segment: The Distribution business is projected to maintain mid-single-digit EBITDA margins (~7%), reflecting challenges such as decelerating tire replacements, pricing pressures, and subdued consumer demand influenced by high interest rates and inflation.
    • Uncertainty in revenue ramps: In the military segment, although contracts are in place, the revenue ramp is described as potentially lumpy due to production delays and variability in contract approvals, which could create short-term revenue volatility.

    Q&A Summary

    1. Material Margins
      Q: Are Material Handling margins sustainable this quarter?
      A: Management noted that Signature’s acquisition boosted margins this quarter; however, they expect a slight decline going forward due to pricing and volume mix adjustments, maintaining strong overall performance.

    2. Distribution Margins
      Q: Are 7% EBITDA margins in Distribution sustainable?
      A: They believe the current 7% margin is reflective of the consolidated performance despite headwinds, expecting efficiencies through consolidation while margins will remain in a similar range.

    3. Productivity Gains
      Q: What productivity improvements drove footprint consolidation?
      A: Management highlighted that enhanced operations have yielded 20–30% extra capacity, enabling consolidation without sacrificing future production capability.

    4. Signature Capacity
      Q: When will Signature’s added capacity be operational?
      A: A machine was added this year with another coming in 2025, supporting their goal to double revenue and EBITDA over 3–4 years.

    5. Integration Progress
      Q: How is the Signature integration progressing?
      A: The integration is on track with both qualitative and quantitative synergies, including expected $8 million cost synergies in 2025.

    6. Cash Conversion
      Q: What’s driving cash flow conversion changes year-over-year?
      A: They maintain about 60% cash conversion, with differences driven by the Signature acquisition’s working capital impact, expected to normalize over time.

    7. Distribution Cadence
      Q: How is distribution sales cadence evolving recently?
      A: Sales are gradually recovering as the restructured team gains traction, though full recovery is anticipated by 2025.

    8. Military Ramp
      Q: How predictable is the military revenue ramp?
      A: Military contracts arrive in $10–15 million chunks, with initial lumpiness but continuous production once approved, guiding growth toward $40 million.

    9. Additional Military Deals
      Q: Are there prospects for extra military contracts?
      A: There is potential for additional $10–15 million contracts, particularly from European markets with growing defense restocking needs.

    10. Composite Transition
      Q: Is the shift from wood maps to composites evident?
      A: Management observed modest composite penetration—around 10–15% in the U.S.—with long-term growth potential as composites gradually replace traditional materials.

    11. Cardboard Conversion
      Q: How significant is cardboard versus composite in Akro-Mils?
      A: While detailed percentages weren’t provided, Akro-Mils continues to be a high-quality brand where durability and pricing differ, though the focus remains on gradual material conversion over time.

    Analyst Coverage

    Research analysts covering MYERS INDUSTRIES.